IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 19215 of 2010(B)
1. NEENA A., LOWER DIVISION TYPIST,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, KERALA KALAMANDALAM
... Respondent
2. THE REGISTRAR, KERALA KALAMANDALAM
3. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
4. THE DIRECTOR OF VIGILANCE AND ANTI
5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
For Petitioner :SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.)
For Respondent :SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHANPILLAY,KER.KALAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR
Dated :20/08/2010
O R D E R
C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J.
----------------------------
W.P.(C)No.19215 of 2010
----------------------------
Dated 20th August, 2010
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is presently working as Lower Division Typist
under the Kerala Kalamandalam Deemed University. This writ petition
has been filed apprehending termination from service in the light of
Ext.P5 Vigilance Report.
The learned standing counsel appearing for the first
respondent submitted that as per letter dated 25.5.2010 that
accompanied Ext.P5 the first respondent was directed to offer remarks
on Ext.P5. The first respondent is bound to offer remarks in terms of the
said requisition and it will be offered after perusing all the relevant
records, it is further submitted. It is thus obvious that this writ petition
is filed merely on an apprehension. In other words, this writ petition is
premature. The learned standing counsel for the first respondent further
submitted that if at all any action is required to be taken ultimately
against the petitioner, it will be done only in accordance with law. This is
recorded and the writ petition is accordingly, closed.
C.T.RAVIKUMAR
Judge
TKS