High Court Jharkhand High Court

Niman Nagduar & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 9 September, 2011

Jharkhand High Court
Niman Nagduar & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 9 September, 2011
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                    Cr. M. P. No. 1378 of 2011
           Niman Nagouar & Others                              ..... Petitioners
                                           Versus
           The State of Jharkhand & Another                    ..... Respondents
                                           -----
                    CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI
                                           -----
           For the Petitioners          - Mr. M.K.Chitra
           For the Respondents          - Mr. M.B.Lal, A.P.P
                                           -----

2/9.9.2011

In this petition, the petitioners have prayed for cancellation of bail granted to

the O. P. No. 2 by order dated 5.10.10 of this Court passed in B. A. No. 7357/2010.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that for considering his prayer for bail,

the O. P. No. 2 had given the statement that he had undertaken activities in

accordance with the terms of the registration of the Trust, but the said statement is

wholly incorrect. The O. P. No. 2 was not acting in accordance with the terms of the

registration of the Trust. Learned counsel further submitted that there is chance of

tampering with the evidence by the O. P. No. 2.

Learned A.P.P opposed this petition and submitted that none of the grounds

taken by the petitioners is sufficient for cancellation of bail of the O. P. No. 2. This

petition has been filed maliciously without any valid ground and the same is liable to

be dismissed.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has disputed the facts stated in the said bail

order of the O. P. No. 2. Learned counsel has further submitted that there is

apprehension of tampering with the evidence. No cogent and valid ground has been

taken for cancelling the bail granted to the O. P. No. 2 . I, therefore, find no merit in

this petition.

This petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

     S.K                                                         (NARENDRA NATH TIWARI, J)