IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.19005 of 2011
Niraj Kumar Mahto, S/O-Late Ram Pratap Mahto
Versus
The State Of Bihar
-----------
02 29.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Although, petitioner is named in the first information
report with allegation that he along with other accused kidnapped
the minor daughter of the informant but submission of learned
counsel for the petitioner is that the victim was major at the time of
the alleged occurrence and, as a matter of fact, she voluntarily left
her home and subsequently, solemnized her marriage with co-
accused Dhiraj Kumar Mahto by her own sweet will and the
petitioner has been implicated in this case because he happens to be
full brother of aforesaid co-accused Dhiraj Kumar Mahto. It is also
pointed out by him that the victim and aforesaid co-accused Dhiraj
Kumar Mahto are leading their married life somewhere in Nepal
and the whereabouts of the victim and co-accused is not known to
the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as
well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on
bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Basopatti P.S.
Case No. 20 of 2011.
Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)