High Court Kerala High Court

Nissar vs State Of Kerala on 30 November, 2010

Kerala High Court
Nissar vs State Of Kerala on 30 November, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 7672 of 2010()


1. NISSAR, S/O.H.KANNU RAVUTHER,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.TOJAN J. VATHIKULAM

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :30/11/2010

 O R D E R
                       V.RAMKUMAR, J.
            ----------------------------------------------
            Bail Application No.7672 of 2010
           ------------------------------------------------
       Dated this the 30th day of November, 2010

                              ORDER

The petitioner, who is accused No.2 in Crime No.110

of 1995 of Kadakkal Police Station, for offences

punishable under Sections 447, 427 & 324 read with

Section 34 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Consequent on the non-appearance of the

petitioner in C.C.No.312 of 1995 on the file of the Judicial

Magistrate of the First Class-II, Kottarakara, the case

against the petitioner has been transferred to the Long

Pending Case Register as L.P.No.20 of 1998. Admittedly,

non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the

petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify

the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction.

There is no reason why the petitioner should not

surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail.

Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the

Magistrate and files an application for regular bail within

two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and

Bail Appln.No.7672/2010
: 2 :

disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed

notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of

arrest against the petitioner and also after considering

the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous

non-appearance, if any.

With the above observation this application is

disposed of.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

skj