High Court Kerala High Court

Nizamuddin vs V.M.Salahuddin on 14 October, 2008

Kerala High Court
Nizamuddin vs V.M.Salahuddin on 14 October, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 3810 of 2008()


1. NIZAMUDDIN, S/O.KUNHI MAHIN KUTTY HAJI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. V.M.SALAHUDDIN, S/O.MAMMUNHI,
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :14/10/2008

 O R D E R
                             R. BASANT, J.
                -----------------------------------------------
                    Crl.M.C. No. 3810 OF 2008
                -----------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 14th day of October, 2008

                                O R D E R

The petitioner who is one of the three accused persons in a

prosecution for offences punishable under Section 341, 323 and

506 (2) read with 34 IPC (all bailable); who was enlarged on bail at

the crime stage; who had later not appeared before the learned

Magistrate; to procure whose presence coercive processes have

already been issued by the learned Magistrate and who

apprehends imminent arrest has come to this court with the prayer

that directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C may be issued to the

learned Magistrate to comply with the directions in Alice George

vs.Deputy Superintendent of Police [2003(1)KLT 339] and to

consider his application for bail to be filed by him when he

surrenders before the learned Magistrate on merits, in accordance

with law and expeditiously – on the date of surrender itself.

2. Sufficient general directions have already been issued

in Alice George (Supra). It is not necessary for this court in

every subsequent case to issue directions to the Magistracy to

follow the dictum in Alice George (Supra). Every court is bound

to do the same. I have no reason to assume that the same shall

Crl.M.C. No. 3810 OF 2008
-:2:-

not be done. If the directions are not complied with the avenues of

challenge/complaint are available for the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

marriage of the petitioner is scheduled to take place this month

and there may be directions issued in favour of the petitioner to

facilitate his surrender before the learned Magistrate without the

threat and risk of his being arrested and dragged to court by the

police. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, I am

satisfied that a direction can be issued in favour of the petitioner.

It is hence directed that coercive processes issued against the

petitioner shall not be executed, till 28.10.08 on or before which

date the petitioner shall surrender before the learned Magistrate

and seek regular bail.

4. In the result, this petition is dismissed subject to the

above specific observations/direction.

Hand over copy of this order to the learned counsel for the

petitioner for production before the learned Magistrate.

R. BASANT, JUDGE
ttb

Crl.M.C. No. 3810 OF 2008
-:3:-

Crl.M.C. No. 3810 OF 2008
-:4:-

Crl.M.C. No. 3810 OF 2008
-:5:-