IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.51269 of 2007
NOOR MOHAMMAD
...PETITIONER
Versus
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
2. LADO
3. ISHRAT JAHAN @ ASHRAT KHATOON
4. SANO @ ALI FAISAL
5. MALIKA
...OPPOSITE PARTIES
For the petitioner :Mr.Ram Kant Sharma, Sr. Advocate
For the o.ps. :Mr.D.K.Sinha, Sr. Advocate,
:Mr.Md. Anis Akhtar &
:Mr.Arif Siddique
-----------
05. 05.10.2010 Heard counsel for the parties.
Present application has been filed by the informant
seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted in favour of
o.p.nos. 2 to 5 by learned Sessions Judge, Patna.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that a wrong
submission was made before the court for seeking bail.
Learned counsel for the opposite parties, on the
contrary, submits that order impugned was passed in presence of
the counsel representing the informant. It is contended that the
occurrence, as per the prosecution case, had taken place in the
year 2005, whereas the FIR was lodged in the year 2007. It is
further submitted that there is no allegation of misuse of privilege
of bail.
This Court on going through materials on record is
satisfied that no case for cancellation of anticipatory bail is made
out. The application is accordingly dismissed.
At this stage, both the parties submit that the case is
2
now pending trial after commitment. Both the counsels assure the
Court that they would fully co-operate in expeditious disposal of
the trial. Let the aforesaid stand of the parties be recorded.
( Kishore K. Mandal )
hr