High Court Kerala High Court

Noushad vs State Of Kerala on 19 December, 2008

Kerala High Court
Noushad vs State Of Kerala on 19 December, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 4953 of 2008()


1. NOUSHAD, S/O.KHADEEJA, AGED 30 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. KHADEEJA, W/O.ABOOBACKER, AGED 55 YEARS

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. RUKIYA, D/O. MUHAMMED, AGED 28 YEARS,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.LUIZ GODWIN D'COUTH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :19/12/2008

 O R D E R
                              R.BASANT, J
                      ------------------------------------
                     Crl.M.C. No.4953 of 2008
                      -------------------------------------
            Dated this the 19th day of December, 2008

                                  ORDER

Petitioners face allegations in a crime registered alleging

offences punishable, inter alia, under Section 498 A r/w 34 I.P.C.

The petitioners are the husband and mother in law of the defacto

complainant. The defacto complainant filed a complaint before

the learned Magistrate which was referred by the learned

Magistrate to the police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.

Accordingly the crime was registered. Investigation is in

progress.

2. At this stage the petitioners have come before this

Court with a prayer that the powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C

may be invoked to quash the F.I.R registered against him.

3. What is the reason ? The learned counsel for the

petitioners submits that the allegations raised are all false. It is

further submitted that there is no specific reference to the dates

on which the alleged overt acts were committed.

4. At this early stage of investigation, I shall carefully

avoid any detailed discussions about the acceptability of the

Crl.M.C. No.4953 of 2008 2

allegations or the credibility of the data collected. Suffice it to

say that the allegations raised, it can by no stretch of

imagination be held, do not constitute an offence under Section

498 A I.P.C. At this early stage and with the available inputs,

this Court cannot hazard an opinion as to whether the

allegations are false or true. Suffice it to say that allegations if

true, the registration of the F.I.R cannot be faulted. It is for the

Investigator to ascertain the falsity or correctness of the

allegations and take appropriate and necessary action.

5. This Crl.M.C is, in these circumstances, dismissed, but

without any fetter on the right of the petitioners to seek

anticipatory bail or to appear before the learned Magistrate or

the Investigating Officer and then seek regular bail. Needless to

say, such application must be considered on merits, in

accordance with law and expeditiously by the court concerned.

6. Hand over a copy of this order to the learned counsel

for the petitioners.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
rtr/-