Karnataka High Court
Nwkrtc vs Mahadev on 3 July, 2008
hearing, the learned ceumeel. fer *beth,utfie_j parties submit that the matter thast'beefit settled between the pattieel' Leareefi eeuneel appearing for the @etiti0net,eebmite that the emeunt payable by Wthe tc§rpo:ae;en to the respondent ;is?:Rs.3,25fOGOf*;* which is not
disputed fly the Ieathedteeueeel appearing fer
the respohdent.{e eLeerned counsei fer the
petitienet”M ‘fuLthete”=”eubmite that the
C0reo:etion”,wii1 7ieeue a chefiue for the
efefeeafd amount in favour of the respondent
Q:thih’fa¢”ee:ied of eight weeks frem teday
befete ethe} Centreliiege Autherity. Learned
‘”,deeeselufifer the respendent eubmite the- en
“_feeeiet ef the aforesaid amount, the
‘”»:ee§endent will not Dreee the application
“before the centreliing Authority.
R
,4…
Recording the afoxesaid Submission sf thé
parties, the writ petition 13 disp03G¢vQf[‘Nc
costs.
A
KLY/