Office Of The Official Liquidator vs Nil on 14 October, 2008

_ 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA_ATE§AfiQALO§Eu "

DATED THIS wag lym any OE QTOEER 20§é _?

BEEDRE H 

THE HON'BLE MRs.JuéTiCm B V $AGARA§HNA

c;A;Noj15é1z2¢c?

%'IE;

OFFICEvQE;THEx" .
oFF:cIAL'g:g§$gAwQR, ._
HIGH COURT G? KARNATAKA
4TH FLOQR, D a-F--wI§G'
KENDRIYA_sADAN';"'
Ko§AMANGALA'~' '

»»_ BgfiGA;oge--560,Q34

'» {Bi 3%: :§a?AK, ADV.,)

ENE

COJP,NQ.34f9b  

...APPLICANT

...RESPONDENT

-3…

THIS APPLICATION IS FILED LI3\11jERV ‘I3}ElC’l’fif{§iI¢«.V “‘–._

462 05* THE COMPANIES ACT, .1%–5«R;{w .E§ULEZSVl_.1.(£..)
AND 298 OF THE’. COMPANIEIS (CQURfjT)?_ ;2.UI;Esa,=.TTA19T56

PRAYING TO APPOINT AN AUDITOR TC} _ AuD.1T_f.T}iE_
ACGQUNTS OF THE OFFICIAL LIQaImAT<:;I§VV'EoRV; THE;
HALF YEAR ENDING 3£1_._"9.,2o0:r.__ HIS"

REMUNERATIGN ANS ETC.,

THIS APpLIc;IT'I.oN QdI$5III§i<Z{ "«.0N FOR ORDERS
THIS BAY, THE COURT _IviAiJ£,}f'~'1*HE§'IIIEIDLLOWING:

AuditdrfSwIépQ:fiuScCSpted. Auditor's fee
is fixed IS farms of {he drder dated 8.6.2007

passéd on OfiRfNS.2l§7?Q0?.

~C Réqgirément «Of Section 462(5) of the

‘COmpaaiSSIfiCt is dispensed with.

uuficcbfdingly, the applicatiom is disposed

Sd/:1»
J’ud<j'5

bkv