Office Of The Official Liquidator vs Nil on 14 October, 2008

_gAN§ALQRE--56e.e34 ....

- 1 H
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN§ALoRE

DATED THIS THE 14*" DAY OF oCTQ$ER52§é3 x

THE HON'BLE MRs.JUsTicE B V NAGHRREfiN§_ 

c.A.No.1537/2907
'f'zN *- . _
CO.P.NQ#$5l/99_"

BETWEEN

OFFECE Q? THg="_
OF¥ICIAL LIQUIDATOR .'
HIGH COURT OF KARMAEAKA
4*" FLOOR, fl & F wxms
KENDRIYA'SADAN; '*
K9RAMANGALA"' '

<j3$5SRif§gE9AK, ADV.,)

2ND;"

-5--gut-ulh-1'

...RESPONDENT

…APPLICRNT

-2…

THIS APPLICATION 18 FILED

462 05* THE’. COMPANIES ACT, URT’}, RULr:;~:1;-}}..’1w356

PRAYING TO APPOINT AN 3~’\U’DI’$;’.OR *1*’3?HE”..,

ACCOUNTS 01;’ THE OFFICIAL L.1jQLr:DA”:*0R;,._§fo:rg: T1-if.-_:f
HALE’ YEAR ENDING 3–Q_.”9,1,20o’:’._ ‘Am ‘~-FIX HIS

REMUNERATION AND ETC.,

THIS }3.PPLICF§l”ION.’_VA FOR moms
THIS BAY, THE COURT ;r~a’AaEj’:= ‘I”HE_1VEfOLiJC3WING:

Auditd£f§D:ep§:£»accépt§d. Auditor’s fee

is fix<=2;::I_"'J;.1f:i" ti-;e…o§rde;: dated 8.6.2007

passéd on ¢fiRfN§§$i;}2QO7.

,€;éequirémen§W,o£ Section 462{5} of the

=_.C0mpafiies Rat is dispensed with.

%”aég¢ffiing1y, the application is disposed

Ekifié

% gkv Judd?