Office Of The Official Liquidator vs Nil on 21 October, 2008

_ 1 _
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE
DATED THIS THE 21?? BAY OF OTOBER 2$6é} ',

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MRs.sUsT:cE~B-v«NAGAfiAéH§A ; V  

c.A.No.499/éqg§T 
co.9.Ne;g;§§"

--...___w..........-----.-

OFFICE 09 THE @FFICIRL LiQUIDATOR
HIGH COURT GF*KRRNATPx?Wf47H FLOOR
D & F WING, KENDRIXAMSADAN
KGRAMANGALA,'BANsAL0RE~56o 034
*V" .'u v ** ...APPLICANT

"*._(Bf SE: DEEPER; A$v.,)

uni ---.._..........

NI£~
...RESPONDENT

TTHIS APPLICATION IS FILEII) UNDER SECTION

2év6″2 OF THE’. COMPANIES ACT, 1956 R/W RULES llib}

AND 298 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1956

“MPRFXYING TO APPOINT AN AUDITOR T0 AUDIT THE

ACCOUNTS OF THE? OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR FOR THE

-2-

HALF YEAR ENDING 31.3.2008 AND sx2sVH:s
REMUNERATION AND ETC., s’-:.*

THIS APPLICATION COMING ON “fiéRf»sR§E§ss

THIS BAY, THE COURT MADE Tag FoLLowm§e;=.aV,

Auditor’s report séqeptéd, VAfidi£Or!s fees

is fixed in terms of tbs arse: dated 5.6.2007

passed in OLR No.2li£2QQ74u

éé§sirémefi£ _§:f se¢£ion 462(5) of the

Compasiss Act is sisbehsed with.

–[KAhcordingi§f the application is disposed

s…<5f_. V'

Ekiflé
Iudcjfi

a %:Wbkv