Office Of The Official Liquidator vs Nil on 21 October, 2008

_ 1 _

IN THE HIGH COURT op KARNATAKA AT73ANsA:éRtf '.

DA?ED THIS THE 21" may 0? OCTOBEé 2Q@87 K
BEEURE _ 'A V A
THE HON'BLE MRs.JGsfiicg B u NAQRRRTQNA

g;§,No-496;g§§§
co.§;No,35/gggj, ;

BETWEEN

QFFICE oF_THE1oFFIcrAL.LIQUJDATOR
HIGH cowRTAoF'KARNaTAKA;*4'H ?LOOR
D & E w:NG;}K5wDRI$A.saaAN
KORAMANGALA,'a3NGALeRE;560 034
'u"% 7. v* "a'"' ...APPLICANT

(BY 32: aéE?3K;'Abv:,}

'...--...'.-_..._.. .,

fiIi~'."

. . . RESPONDENT

TPI.fS APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION

‘.3462 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 R/W RULES ll(b)
‘Ana 298 0? THE compawzas {COURT} RULES, 1956
A_’X=PRAYING 1%: APPOINT zua AUDITOR ima AUBIT ‘ram
‘*.,AcccuNTs of’ THE OFFICIAL JLIQUIDATOR FOR THE

– 2 _

HALE’ YEAR ENDING 3.1.3.200
REMUNERATICIN AND ETC.,

THIS APPLICATION COMENé:”bN’*€GRV:OfiDERS_

THIS may, THE COURT MADE THE_EoLLomING;V 5

GREEK
Auditor’s re1:>u4c’>Jf’1.;- fee
is fixed in_te:ma’5f=£m§;§;¢erjaated 8.6.2007
passed
462(5) of the
Companié&5._”Act ‘diaxfiensed wit h .

‘Vvffifizcoxniiinigly, the application is disposed

3d/E

Iudcfé’

i ” ~ Mbkv

ANrf;_F:g..1::3.iV.