Office Of The Official Liquidator vs Nil on 31 July, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT ()9 K.ARNA'I'AKA,   

DATED THIS THE 318T I)AY'VOF«;J"CILY«;3;(}x()gV     
BEF'ORE '      

TI-IE I-ION'I-3LE MR.  VVi§vEDi§Y

COMPANY APPLICATIQNx:;NO';' --~ "OF Q05?

--

CQMPANY P§§’f’i’}{‘ION_;g’§I:?J.’:1′ ‘?__3;_¥_ zoo;

BEN :

OFFICE OE-‘rim *5.» ‘

OFFICEALlJQUIDAf§”OR”~. ”
HIGH comm GE?-KA.RN”A.TAKr’5 .
41′?! FLOQR,_ D 3; :3*«w1Vm
KENDRIYASADAN _ %
KORAMANGALAV
BAN§}AL()RE –z-550’ 034

V} %%%%% APPLICANT

(BY SR1,v’VDE’£§F*AK, ADV)

Am»:

RESPONDENT

‘~.,_ f.-‘THIS APPLICATION IS FILED UNi)ER sscmom 452
or THE coupamnas ACT, 1956 R/W RULES 11(b)ANI) 293

GP THE COMPABHES (COURT) RULES, 1956 PRAYING TO

A’ “APPOINT AN AUDITOR T0 AUDIT THE ACCOUNTS 012* THE
” OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDING

30.09.2007 AND FIX H§S REMUNERATION AND ETC. 9 JK

THIS APPLICATION COMING ON FOR

THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FoLLowmG:., % u
ORDER _ *Qgg’

Auditor’s report accepted. Audimr?s ” =

terms of the order dtd. ..

No.21}/07.

Rflqhiremcnt of ‘fives Act is

U …..

Judge