Office Of The Official Liquidator vs Nil on 31 October, 2008

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATRKR_RT §§fié§LéRE  =""

BRTED THIS THE 31"'DAx 6? GéTbaéR 2§o§C _f5

BEFbR¢x_
THE HON'BLE MRs,ausT:cé?9'v_NAGAaArgfiA

c.A§Nb;43g;gad3[n -
g'GQ.g;No;,86/;999 ,'

-unau---..._.m.uuu

0FFICE_0F Tag QFFIQIAL LIQUIDATOR
HIGH CGURT as KRRNATaKA;'4"*FLo0R
D a F wigs, K£mDgIYA,SabAN
KGRAMANGALA;.BAxGAL9ag--5ao 934

.~v '.,'-F 'v ' ...AP9L:cANT

.. i§¥,§Ri*DEEPAK é SKI V JAXARAM, ADVS.,)

wum-----.-9;-

. . . RESPONDENT

“_ t’I’I-iIS APPLICEATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
4V{i2 OE’ THE’; COMPANIES ACT, 1956 R/W RULES 11(1)}
_,}_3..ND 298 OF THE CGVIFPXNIES (COURT) RULES. 195-6

PRAYING TO APPOINT AN AUBITOR TO 23.U’I3IT THE

VV ACCOUNTS GE’ THE’. OFFICIAL LIQUIDRTOR FOR THE

bk? m

-2-

HALF YEAR ENDING 31.3.2oa AND~ §I$ :HIS ~u

REMUNERATION AND ETC., ‘ *.

THIS APPLICATION coMIfiGV7bfl: §Ofi »ORB$R$ ‘

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE*?Hs FQLL0wING; W_ ;
OR_Eé” _ . _ .

Auditor’s repoft acCe§§e§L ffiuditor’s fee
is fixd in tefms Qf tfi£ §fdgr1dfifed 8.6.200?
passed in SEE §a;311f2G07{‘
Requifeméfit $fa S@&fiiqn. 462(5) of the
Companies Ac£”iS=dispéfiSe§ with.

W,A¢ée;dibglfi}athe application is allowed.

Sd/-

Iudge .