Office Of The Official Liquidator vs Nil on 31 October, 2008

:O;éi«s§: Ofiséam & SRI V JAYARAM, AOvs.,}

 ' 7. a*1*~;:::;'s APPLICATION Is FILED UNDER SECTION
3,462 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 R/W RULES 1l(b}

-,V O ANO-298 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT; RULES, 1956
ffa_PRAYING ffi) APPOINT xv; AUDITOR ax) AUDFP THE

'a ACCOUNTS OF THE CKTICIAL LIQUIOATOR FOR THE

 

_ 1 _

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARN$§AfiA Aw E§$fiALfi#E;#
DATED THIS THE 3lMyDBY OE GCTOB§R42Qb8: V
BEF6éé  O _ . W
THE HON'BLE MRS;JUSTi§$d§fiVaNAGfifiR§HNA

c.A.No}4i§[éO0§5¢.fl

  
4«A.T.Ok%O'_qO;Op.;«OO;16/19%;,

OFFICE Or THE GFEICIALOEIQUIDATOR
HIGH coufir OF KARNRTAKA;,4"'FLOOR
D & F WING; KENDRIYA=SfiDAN
KORAMANGALA;rBANGALORE#56G O34
:'"u. '~x ...APPLICANT

-av.--._---um

. . . RESPONDENT

-2-

HALF YEAR ENDING 31.3.2008 ,aޤj.fixgV$is, =

REMUNERATION AND ETC.,

THIS APPLICATION C0flIfiG ‘0N »FOR= Géaéfis

THIS DAY, THE COURT MRQB THE FOLLOWI§G;V f

GRfiER

Auditor’s refidfit’a§b?%§éd; V£uditor’s fee
is fixed in termfi Qt tfiéfiapfier dated 8.6.2007
passed ;n’QLE~Ed;2;ifi20Qig _»

Fgequitémégt. of Séction 452(5) of the
Companie§ Ac£ is_&i$pensed with.

‘V V.$c¢Q%&ingly, the application is allowed.

sdli
Tudkfla

V “Ekv