Office Of The Official Liquidator vs Nil on 31 October, 2008

*}N:LV

 V _ .T°r§IS" APPLICATIGN IS FILED UNDER SECTION
"fl462*OE THE COPANIES ACT, 1956 R/W RULES llfb)
*»_ VRNDWZQ8 OF THE C$MPANIBS (COURT) RULES, 1956
PRAYING TO APPOINT AN EXUDITOR T0 AUDIT THE
*-.,PL(3£;'OUNTS OF' THE OFFICIAL LIQUIQATOR FOR THE

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT aANGALޤz_
DATED THIS THE 31"'nAy OF OCTOBER 20Qs § a
BEFORE A

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B § §AGaR3wHNA.  

c.A.No.ggg/2oe$ ~

IN_*, _V
CO.P.NO.251!l999 ~

BETWEEN

-.~-.n--.--..-------

OFFICE OF THE_O?FICIAL LIQUIDATOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKR{.d#§FLOOR
D a F wING;15ENDR1yA0$AfiAfi"
KQRAMANGALA,%3ANsALoR3»5£0 034

.» v.'~* - ...APPLICANT

(BY SRi"bEEFAKg§ sai V JAXARAM, ADVS.,)

ANfiP x

j  .

. . .RESPONDENT

-2-

HALF YEAR ENDING 31.3.2008 Ana jyifi HISv.

REMUNERATION AND ETC., 1*

THIS APPLICATION coMiné= éNT”EbR.:oRbB§s

THIS DAY, THE COURT MABE_THE7£GLLOH1N3:wV ;

0*§§§_

Auditor’s rep$t§’éc§E9E§é; Auditor’s fee
is fixed in farms 5f §n§<5:gér»&ated 8.6.206?
passed in o@R?ng;21;/2037; %

Reqqiréfiéfig ;§£ 'section 462(5) of the

Cempaniée Act iégdiépensed with.
§'Agcordigg1y,'the application is allowed.

Shii-

Tuckqe