IN THE HIGH mum OF KARNATAKA, BANGA£;CiI§E
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY 01? SEPI'EMBE3i'é;.,' X"
THE Honwgm MR. '
C.A. No 797 0;!'
A ,
COMPANY PE'1'rr1Csx'2~Jo. 2?2_/f2:>02
BETWEEN:
1 OFFICIAL i;}Q'UIBATO§§ or A.
M/S V_IC§'QF{_Y_-.'Gi.rASS.,z& A %
INI)UE.1'I'R1§E.'S (m=LIQN)
ATFACHED op KARNATAKA
41$: F:..e.«:*R, Eifiinmsnasmm
%
BANGALORE+34_ %
._ (ByV'S%_'i'VDEEPA.K =&\{,IAYARAM, Adv.)
u1* M ) SA2~:1sé--E--sHAsm WINES & DISTILLERY
MAHABOOBNAGAR
M RESPUNDENT
ms Appiioafion is flied under section 446(2) of the
ff .Cr:3Empa11ics Act, 1956, read with Ruic 9 of the Commnim
Rules, 1959, praying to aant a decree: in favctar of
' " the appiicant against the respondent for a sum cf Rs.
53,168/– with intetm am the saw ofRs.3-4,035/~– at 6% per
in question was wound up pursuant to
2272 % %
A Vj Official Liquidator attached to this court was
” alfipointad as per the provisions of section 449 of the
Companies Act. The respondent is ind:-zbted a sum of Raw
annum fmna the date of the application i.c. 7 fizhe
date af_it1d%ent, the future kltcrest and etc-gr’ ” . ” .’ ‘ .
This application coming or; fQI’__ ciay,a:
court made the following: ” .. -1’ . 7 p
This Company 446(2)
of the Companies Companies (Court)
2. This decree in favour of
the for a sum of Rs.
53, fate of 6% per annum fi’0iI1 the
date qrthé date ofjudgment.
13.6.2003 in Company Petition No.
‘Z’
8. Having rcfird to the fact that this is a t1’adc_(_l¢bt and
the statement affairs filed by the ex~Di1’ect;()1″S “-«A4 the
company discioses that the said amount
respondent, I am of the view’ tl’l3’3;'”i’.1″1€l’C
impediment in granting the ”
noticed that the mspondentVisv. s@ ed. .”
participate in the presxjnt as, it
.9. i216′ ‘ is mssed
sal-
Judge
maieVthereian. _ A