High Court Karnataka High Court

Olambra Narayana Gowda vs The Executive Officer on 3 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Olambra Narayana Gowda vs The Executive Officer on 3 June, 2008
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALL.¢3;éfi%kk.% _ 

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF'      % T  LV

BEFORE

THE HON'I3LE MR. JUSTICE   

WRIT PEIITIQN No.2 1970:?’ 2907 “:L_,B§-ELEJE
B EN VA %% Z

1 OLAMBRA NARAYANA Vsowmg»
S/0 YELLANNA GéOWDfi % ‘
AGED
R/AT C)LAM.BRA__H0iIS’E, ‘ _
KADR1RUBYAVA3’§A VILEAGE;
BE}L’FPmN::}AD?Y”TA1{UK.

2 PRABHAKARA
S/O BABU SHE’l5i’»Y”‘**
AGED ABOUT;.42=.YEARs,
R1 0.. UPPAFJKA, V

* «ODILNALA

‘- » BELTHANGADY. PETITIONERS.

(Byk’%i§ri: KM’ ADV.)

»1″ ‘ “THB§ EXECUTIVE OFFICER

” TALUK PANCHAYATH,
BELTHANGADY.

% CHANDU L, s/0 KOCHA HARIJAN

MAJOR, VICE«~PRESIDEN’I’,
TALUK PANCHAYATH.

BELT}-IANGADY,
Rf OLAILA VILLAGE & POST,
BELTHANGADY TALUK.

JATTANNA GOWDA
S/QUMANA GOWDA
MAJOR, MEMBER,

BELTAHNGADY TALUK ‘ ”

R/O BELALU VILLAGE NADA,
BELTHANGADY TALUK. % ‘
SMT LETHISHA MEN ,_ZE;’-S A –
W/OXAVIER,
MAJOR,
BELTHANGADY.TA1;UK'” &
PANCHAYATI~I,. Ag.M.H;QUSE’,.. =
NARAVI POS’I’,_ %
BELTHANGADY TALUK, n M

SMT SHA RAI5 AM AH V’ AI3;\LA«’§~’P0O¢1ARY
w/0 M;3HABAI.A”PO0JARY

NiAJOI?f~DAR.'{HAS’I” 119033,

BELTAHANr:sAt;s{2$ALUK
MAJORMEMBER,

BELT:e1AN<1AD*{ TALUK PANCHRYAT.

%$m sunrrm s BHAT
W/0 SUBRAMANYA BHAT
‘-MAJQRQA.’ MEMBER,

BELTHANGADY TALUK PAN CHAXAT,

<3U*1*rINA13AIL,
" 'SAVANAL POST,
* ~-BELTHANGADY TALUK.

sm’ TANUJA SHEKAR
w/0 SHEKHAR POOJARY

10

MAJOR, MEMBER,

BELTHANGADY TALUK PANCHAYAT,,..,.

SWATHI NILAYA,
NAVOOR 1″OST,
BELTHANGADY TALUK.

SR1 ‘1’ G JOY
s/0 P.A.GEORGE
MAJOR, MEMBER,

BELTHANGADY TALUK

TAITHEL MANE, V
THOTATTADI VILLAGE,
BELTHANGADY « ”

SR1 SUKUMARAN.

s/0 BHASKARAN, .

MAJOR, ‘MEMBER, & %
BELTHANGADY’TALL-‘K’? +ECi£AYA’I’,
MERLA ,’
PUDUV’E’1’I’U P0s’1′. ‘

M BELTELANGADY ”

83:21

S/_0<
M5303:

L % BELTHANeAJ3f3rTTALUK PANCHAYATH

MUDDICEMANE,

ARASINAMAIQG POST,

SELTHANGADY TALUK.

KUM. YAMUNA
D/0 KORAGA HARIJAN
A % % MAJOR, MEMBER,
* BELT}-IANGADY TALUK PANCHAYATH,

HIRTHOTIU MANE,
N1’l”I’ADA POST, i
BELTHANGADY TALUK. L

THIS PETITION, coM§NG ON FOR PRELIMIN)§R Y-..
HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, ms DAY THE coum:%%n«;A:>1s; %

THE FOLLOWING:

9_g_p_§.§_ %

Learned counsel fvor t11e
he does not mess this the
submission of V’ “petition is
dismissfld