P.A.Ashraf vs The Senior Environment Officer on 7 December, 2007

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 25440 of 2007(C)


1. P.A.ASHRAF, PULICKAKUDY HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. P.A.MUHAMMED, RESIDING IN DO...DO...
3. P.U.MAJEED, PATTARUMADAM HOUSE,
4. V.S.YOUSEF, VELLAKDY HOUSE,
5. P.M.SALEEM, PULICKAKUDY HOUSE,

                        Vs



1. THE SENIOR ENVIRONMENT OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE HON'BLE OMBUDSMAN FOR LOCAL SELF

3. THE VENGOLA GRAMA PANCHAYAT,REPRESENTED

4. M/S.SALAH SAW MILL & INDUSTRIES,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :07/12/2007

 O R D E R
                                 ANTONY DOMINIC, J.

                       ---------------------------------------------------

                               W.P.(C) 25440 OF 2007

                                               &

                                   I.A.16115 OF 2007

                       ---------------------------------------------------

                               Dated: December 7, 2007

                                        JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for orders, learned counsel appearing for

the petitioners reported that they have given up their vakalath and that they are

no longer appearing for the petitioners.

2. Along with I.A.No.16115/2007, the 4th respondent has produced an

affidavit sworn to by the petitioners to the effect that they have filed this writ

petition on a wrong understanding of facts. That apart, learned counsel for the

Pollution Control Board submits that the 4th respondent has already been given

consent in respect of the dryer unit.

In view of this I do not think it necessary to keep this writ petition pending.

Writ petition will stand dismissed.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE

mt/-