High Court Kerala High Court

P.Abubackker vs The Printhalmanna Municipality on 24 March, 2009

Kerala High Court
P.Abubackker vs The Printhalmanna Municipality on 24 March, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 37521 of 2008(S)


1. P.ABUBACKKER, PULLORCHANGADAN HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. MOHAMMED MUSTHAFFA,

                        Vs



1. THE PRINTHALMANNA MUNICIPALITY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.S.R.BANNURMATH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

 Dated :24/03/2009

 O R D E R
             S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. & Kurian Joseph, J.
                 ------------------------------------------
                    W.P.(C) No.37521 of 2008
                 ------------------------------------------
              Dated, this the 24th day of March, 2009

                            JUDGMENT

S.R.Bannurmath, C.J.

Petitioners have approached this Court by this Public

Interest Litigation seeking a writ of mandamus forbidding the

respondents from closing down the public market functioning at

the Jubilee Bye Pass between Perinthalmanna and Kozhikode and

also seeking a direction to the respondents to continue the running

of the public market as before.

2. As against the resolution of the Municipality to close

down the market, W.P.(C) No.37879 of 2008 has been filed and a

learned Single Judge by his order dated 19th December, 2008, by

way of interim order, has directed the Municipality not to close

down the fish market and to take appropriate steps to see that the

market is continued either by the Municipality themselves or by

any other licensee. In view of this direction issued, the interests of

W.P.(C) No.37521 of 2008

– 2 –

the petitioners are very well taken care of and as such, the first

prayer in the writ petition does not survive for further

consideration. So far as the second prayer is concerned, it is open

for the petitioners to approach the Municipality and put up their

grievances which can be considered by the Municipality in

accordance with law.

In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed

of.

S.R.Bannurmath,
Chief Justice

Kurian Joseph,
Judge
vns