High Court Kerala High Court

P.G.Gopalakrishnan Nair vs The State Of Kerala on 25 June, 2008

Kerala High Court
P.G.Gopalakrishnan Nair vs The State Of Kerala on 25 June, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 19020 of 2008(L)


1. P.G.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. P.S. MINI KUMARI,PULIYURUMBIL HOUSE,

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :25/06/2008

 O R D E R
                          R.BASANT, J.
                       ----------------------
                    W.P.C.No.19020 of 2008
                   ----------------------------------------
              Dated this the 25th day of June 2008

                         J U D G M E N T

The grievance of the petitioners is about non-registration of

a proper F.I.R and not conducting a proper investigation into an

F.I.R which is already registered. The number, details etc. are

not furnished. However, it is submitted that Ext.P1 application

submitted before the Superintendent of Police has not evoked

any proper action.

2. In short, the grievance is about non-registration of

crime and the failure to conduct a proper investigation. The

decision in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P & Others [2008 AIR SCW

309] which has been followed by this court in Vasanthi Devi v.

Sub Inspector of Police [2008(1) KLT 945] has changed the law

on the point and they are authority for the proposition that a

person aggrieved by such non-registration of the F.I.R or the

omission to conduct a proper investigation cannot rush to this

court with applications under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India or under Section 482 Cr.P.C. They must first take resort to

the equally efficacious alternative remedy available to them

under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C before the learned Magistrate.

W.P.C.No.19020/08 2

3. Inasmuch as the petitioners have not exhausted the

said equally efficacious alternative remedy, I am satisfied that

this writ petition cannot be considered favourably.

4. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Needless

to say, the petitioners’ right to approach the learned Magistrate

with a proper application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C shall

remain unfettered by the dismissal of this petition.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

W.P.C.No.19020/08 3

W.P.C.No.19020/08 4

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007