High Court Kerala High Court

P.J.Varghese vs The Manager on 6 June, 2007

Kerala High Court
P.J.Varghese vs The Manager on 6 June, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 26503 of 2003(E)


1. P.J.VARGHESE, 72, CENTURY TERRACE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE MANAGER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE

3. THE COCHIN STOCK EXCHANGE LIMITED,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.JAMES KOSHY

                For Respondent  :SRI.MATHEW ZACHARIAH

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

 Dated :06/06/2007

 O R D E R
                                   KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

                     -----------------------------------------

                           W.P(C)No.26503  of  2003

                     -----------------------------------------

                    Dated this the 6th day of  June, 2007


                                      JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers:-

ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other

appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the first

respondent to direct the 3rd respondent to refund to the

petitioner the entire amount collected by the 3rd respondent

from the petitioner with 12% interest, till the date of payment;

iii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other

appropriate writ, order or direction to direct the first

respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P11 in

accordance with law and issue appropriate direction to the 3rd

respondent, immediately.

Since Ext.P11 is pending before the first respondent, the writ petition

is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P11 with

notice to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent and pass appropriate

orders thereon in accordance with law and communicate the same to

the petitioner and the 3rd respondent within a period of three months

from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. It is made

clear that in case the first respondent finds that any amounts are due

to be paid by the 3rd respondent to the petitioner the amounts will be

specified and the time for repayment will also be specified.

(KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE)

ahg.