IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.NO.50l8 OF 3009
.1.
IN 'ME HIGH OOURTOF KARMA TAKA ATBANl3ALO%
mun mm mm: 28:]: on or names.
THEHONBLE A
\.:.r.P.No. 5013 0.9' 200% ',GPv{--;'{,E;B';AA"--. 0
BE.fwEE.*~.|
1 P K supumma
SIO. LATE M P KALEGOIJDA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS M
occ: BUSINESS 0
RIO. PANNIDODDI V0 ; 0
TALUK MADDUR, DIST MANDYA. 0 0. _
~ " % ....jw.é--ftTi0NER
,..\,t L R.fi.JA .. 'iHE$§'%M ;'(UI_.%R."7E§ '5IBVfi" 'F553
AND :
1 KA£tNAm<AV!=";3\NEaVTRANa.Masst0N CORPORATION LTD
' REF-'".0.BY as cHiisa=~-gNa1uE5R*- 1. '
ELEC-TT<iCAL, TEN'BERiNG. my PROCUREMENT
K P_ '1' c 0;. caxuvsav BHAVAM
pAuGALC:"v';E. . 0
2 Ex.-*é.'ca.=.I:~.»*E s':'~se.:..*.-.r5.=.=..==e
..vEt.~E€_31'VRiG_ALS %%%%%
. V MANDYA MAJOR,
' V *WGRKE E)§'Jl$§N. K P T C L
" _,N'R y}0m1.A.s_.V MYSORE -- 570007.
RESPONDENTS
— gen: wk c3.u’r%=IA’ érnunine oouns.-5:. FOR RESPONDENTS )
‘ .. ,THas’*-*w.p.Is_ FILED uunen ARTICLES 220 2. 221 0:: THE
– – V % musnwuracu 05 040:.-x. 9.=:.-*0.-‘::~..v3 TQ 00:50? R’: has R2 To coi~asr:u.-.”R
THEREPRESENTATION or. 10.1.2003 vans ANNEx.0. AND wuss
_V .APF~’ROPRlATE omens.
THIS W.P§ COMING ON FOR PRELIWNARY HEARING DAY:
‘ ‘ ‘ ~ 0 0 X ” ~ V:fiié’couRT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.NO.S0l8 (F 3398
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. W.’P.NO.50I8 OF $03
.g.
QRDER:
The petitioner in this petition nee _
direction t we iueportdai-its-1 and 2 ‘- a
representation dated 10.1.2008 vide
interest of justice and equity. _ V it . i
2. The only gri_.-en_ce of out
by iearneci counsei appearing fj}. in me ineiant
writ petition is tl_1et:,; hie detailed
repreeentaticin ‘ tride Annexure–D
ad 1 ____ _,
III
uunw
– u
AID
decision in Vtekeri -oreepondent so far. in View of
inaction .on pert .vofA2?’V°”‘rVeepondent in not considering
‘Vptlie. piiirenvby petitioner, he was constrained
to i.’ri’i!”:?iITa”‘i:’t:.1ii-‘3.VWi”if “tition same: 5 a
as stated
A. have heard learned counsel appearing for
‘.’_rr’peti;tionr and learned standing couneel appearing for
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. AT BANGALORE W.P.NO.50l8 OF 2008
JD-
it
‘I
ti
53
I…
‘l
EB
=9.
ID
at
55″
E!
i
E1
S5
at
E1
the oumet submitted that, the representation -.
petitioner will be considered and appropriate
be taken, in accordance with
as possible at any within a four” fine
date of receipt of a copy . _
5; in view of by !eem..d.
counsai apP93ii’@ri9′ expressing
any opinionvon would euffioe for this
Court petition. with a direction to
by petitioner viaarmnaxurego dated 10.1.2003 and
i ‘game, in accordance with law, after
~ .- «._ ‘ea’peditietjfeiy as
7_ree§-ohable opportunity to the petitioner,
……….fl..l _
assume, within a period of four
‘i of receipt of a copy of this order. Ondered
imséordingly. /
753»
/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.NO.50l8 CF 2008
IN THE HIG!-I COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. W.P.N0.S0l8 OF 1108
~4-
Sri. N.K Gupta, Standing Counsel is
4A-_- i’
IN THE HIGH COURT 0:? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.’P.NO.50l8 or zoos