High Court Kerala High Court

P.K.Valsan @ Valsan Thiliangery vs State Of Kerala on 12 September, 2006

Kerala High Court
P.K.Valsan @ Valsan Thiliangery vs State Of Kerala on 12 September, 2006
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5381 of 2006()


1. P.K.VALSAN @ VALSAN THILIANGERY,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.M.JAMES

 Dated :12/09/2006

 O R D E R
                           J.M.JAMES, J.

                              --------------

                          B.A. 5381/2006

                            ------------------

 DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2006




                              O R D E R

The petitioner is before this Court, under

Section 439 Cr.P.C., as the fourteenth accused in crime

No.167/2006 of Iritty Police Station, for the offence

punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148 and 302 IPC read

with Section 149 IPC and also under Section 3 and 5 of the

Explosive Substance Act and 27(1) of the Indian Arms Act.

2. On two occasions, the petitioner was granted

bail, as per the order dated 19.7.2006 and 16.8.2006, in

connection with the cremation of his father as well as the

40th day obituary ceremonies connected with the demise of

his father. He was arrested on 3.7.2006. Except those

nineteen days, when he was on bail, he is in judicial

custody for the last 52 days.

3. The learned counsel submitted that the

petitioner is under police protection because of the order

of the Government, as he had been the worker of the

B.A.5381/2006

2

R.S.S and the Hindu Iykya Vedi. The offence alleged

against him is more so under Section 120B IPC, despite

the other sections of the offence. It is also submitted

that the petitioner is a person, who is running a parallel

college at Iritty.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, however,

submitted that there is a tension in the locality and the

petitioner being an important person in the organisation

of R.S.S., as well as Hindu Iykya Vedi, the release of the

petitioner may adversely affect the situation in the

locality. The prosecution further submitted that the

petitioner may not be allowed to enter the Sessions

division of Kannur for sometime.

5. After hearing the submissions, in detail,

made by either side, I grant bail and release the

petitioner from jail, subject to the following conditions:-

(a). The petitioner shall execute a bond

for Rs.25,000/-, with two solvent sureties,

each for the like sum, to the satisfaction

of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Mattannur.

B.A.5381/2006

3

(b). Immediately on release, the

petitioner shall report before the

Investigating Officer of Iritty police

Station, who is investigating crime

No.167/2006, and from there he shall go

out of the sessions division of Kannur.

(c). The petitioner shall not enter the

sessions division of Kannur, for a period

of three months.

(d). The petitioner shall furnish the

address of his residence to the

Investigating Officer of the nearest police

station, within which limit he would

reside for the above period of three

months.

(e). The petitioner shall report before

the S.H.O of the police station, where he

would reside for the above said period.

(f). On completion of the period of three

months, he shall report before the

Investigating Officer of Iritty police

Station, on the first working day of every

month, between 10.00 a.m and 11.00

B.A.5381/2006

4

a.m., till the final trial and disposal of the

sessions case, by the competent Court of

law.

The application is allowed as above.

J.M.JAMES

JUDGE

mrcs