P.Karthiani vs Chinna on 19 October, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 408 of 2003(P)


1. P.KARTHIANI D/O.VELU (LATE)
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. CHINNA, ULLATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. AYYOOB P.K., S/O. MOHAMMEDKUTTY,

3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COM.LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :19/10/2009

 O R D E R
                          M.N.KRISHNAN, J.
                           -------------------------
                 M.A.C.A.NO. 408 & 410 OF 2003
                     -------------------------------------
             Dated this the 19th day of October, 2009.

                            J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would

contend before me that these appeals are preferred by the owner of

the vehicle against the direction to re-imburse the amount to the

Insurance Company. But a perusal of the award would reveal that

such a direction has been given in favour of the Insurance Company

only in O.P.(MV) No. 1519/1997, which is an award for Rs. 2250/-.

The said award is not appealable in view of the specific order in M.V

Act. Since there is no order for reimbursement of the amount

awarded in O.P.(MV) No. 1519/97 and 2163/97, these appeals do not

merit any consideration and therefore they are dismissed.

M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE

ln.