High Court Madras High Court

P.M.Veeramuthu vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 16 June, 2008

Madras High Court
P.M.Veeramuthu vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 16 June, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16-6-2008
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.CHOCKALINGAM
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU
HCP No.587 of 2008
P.M.Veeramuthu						.. Petitioner

vs

1.The State of Tamil Nadu
  rep. By its Secretary 
  	to Government
  Home Department, Fort St. George
  Chennai 600 009.
2.The Superintendent of Police
  Villupuram District
3.The Inspector of Police
  Villupuram West Police Station
  Villupuram District, Villupuram
4.The Inspector of Police
  Central Bureau of Investigation
  Villupuram District, Villupuram		.. Respondents 
	Habeas corpus petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of habeas corpus to direct the respondents to produce the petitioner's minor daughter namely Jansi Rani alias Lakshmi Bai aged 15 years before this Court and hand over his daughter's custody to the petitioner.
		For Petitioner		:  Mr.V.A.Jayakumar

		For Respondents	:  Mr.Babu Muthu Meeran
						   Additional Public
							Prosecutor for RR1 to 3

						   Mr.N.Chandrasekaran
						   Special Public Prosecutor
							for CBI
 ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.CHOCKALINGAM, J.)
Invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioner one Veeramuthu has filed this petition alleging that his own daughter aged 14, who was doing her SSLC in the year 2004, was found missing on 23.12.2004; that a complaint was given to the third respondent police on 30.12.2004; that a case came to be registered in Crime No.1226 of 2005; that since she has not been traced, originally a petition in HCP No.275 of 2005 was filed; that pending that petition, the Court ordered transfer of investigation to the CB CID, but of no avail, and then, the Court came to the rescue by passing another order on 11.12.2006, transferring the investigation of the case from CB CID to the CBI, who is the fourth respondent herein, and it also closed the said HCP by issuing a direction to the CBI to keep the investigation pending till the girl is secured, and till the time, the petitioner should be kept informed of the progress of the investigation once in two months. Now, the petitioner, who was actually informed about the progress, has brought forth HCP No.587 of 2008, which is the instant one, since his daughter was not secured.

2.The affidavit in support of the petition is perused. The Court heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and also the learned Special Public Prosecutor for the CBI.

3.According to the learned Counsel for CBI, there was a direction already given in HCP No.275 of 2005, and the order was passed by the Court on 11.12.2006, and the publication was made throughout India and through all the media, and they have taken hectic steps to secure not only the girl, but also the boy who went along with her, but could not be secured, and the investigation is kept pending, and the petitioner is also being informed about the progress, and they will be secured and produced before the Court within a reasonable time.

4.After hearing both sides, this Court is of the considered opinion that this petition need not be kept pending, since originally HCP No.275 of 2005 was disposed of by this Court transferring the investigation to the CBI by an order dated 11.12.2006, for the purpose of securing the girl, and it was also ordered that the investigation should be kept pending till that time. Under the circumstances, this Court feels that it would be fit and proper to issue a direction again to the fourth respondent CBI to take stern steps to secure both the boy and the girl within a period of three months herefrom. Accordingly, a direction is issued. Till the time, the petitioner should be informed of the progress of the investigation once in a month. The petitioner is also given liberty to make such a petition if the circumstances warrant so, after a period of three months. Accordingly, this habeas corpus petition is disposed of.

(M.C.,J.) (S.P.V.,J.)
16-6-2008
Index: yes
Internet: yes

Note to office:

Issue order copy
on or before
17-6-2008

nsv/

M.CHOCKALINGAM, J.

AND
S.PALANIVELU, J.

nsv/

To:

1.The State of Tamil Nadu
rep. By its Secretary
to Government
Home Department
Fort St. George
Chennai 600 009.

2.The Superintendent of Police
Villupuram District

3.The Inspector of Police
Villupuram West Police Station
Villupuram District
Villupuram

4.The Inspector of Police
Central Bureau of Investigation
Villupuram District
Villupuram

5.The Special Public Prosecutor
CBI, Madras.

HCP No.587 of 2008

Dt: 16-6-2008