IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 7770 of 2010(U)
1. P.M.YUSAF, PROPRIETOR,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (IB)
... Respondent
2. THE SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR,
4. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,
For Petitioner :SRI.P.N.DAMODARAN NAMBOODIRI
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Dated :10/03/2010
O R D E R
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
..............................................................................
W.P.(C) No. 7770 OF 2010
.........................................................................
Dated this the 10th March, 2010
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is aggrieved of Ext. P11 revenue recovery
notice issue by the third respondent without any regard to the
pendency of Ext.P9 Second Appeal accompanied by Ext. P10
petition for stay which are stated as pending consideration before
the second respondent. The petitioner is also aggrieved of non
finalisation of Ext. P6 appeal which is also pending consideration
before the second respondent in respect of another cause of
action .
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well, who
submits that the recovery proceedings now being pursued against
the petitioner are only in respect of the cause of action projected
in Ext. P9 appeal and it is not in any way connected with the
issue pending consideration in Ext. P6 appeal.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the
W.P.(C) No. 7770 OF 2010
2
second respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate
orders on Ext.P10 petition for stay preferred by the petitioner in
connection with Ext. P9 appeal, in accordance with law, as
expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one
month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. It is
made clear that till such appropriate orders are passed on Ext.
P10 petition for stay, all further proceedings pursuant to Ext. P11
shall be kept in abeyance.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON,
JUDGE.
lk