P.Madhavan vs K.Bhaskaran on 30 May, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1404 of 2001()



1. P.MADHAVAN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. K.BHASKARAN
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :30/05/2008

 O R D E R
                        V. RAMKUMAR, J.
                =====================
                     Crl.R.P. No.1404 of 2001
                =====================
             Dated this the 30th day of May, 2008

                               ORDER

The accused in C.C. No. 19/1998 on the file of the Judicial

First Class Magistrate I, Thamarassery for an offence punishable

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881,

challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed

against him concurrently by the courts below.

2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the

matter. Crl.M.A.No. 4997 of 2008 has been filed under Section

147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission

to record the composition entered into between the revision

petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been

signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant

and their respective counsels. In the light of this development,

the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the

effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the

meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C.

This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above.

V. RAMKUMAR,JUDGE.

css/

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

CRL.R.P. No. of 2008

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Dated this the 28th day of May 2008

O R D E R

The accused in C.C. / ST. No………………on the file of the

J.F.C.M, for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction

entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the

courts below.

2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the

matter. Crl.M.A.No. of 2007 has been filed under Section

147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission

to record the composition entered into between the revision

petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been

signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant

and their respective counsels. In the light of this development,

the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the

effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the

meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. Money, if any, deposited by the

revision petitioner pursuant to the orders, if any, passed by the

lower appellate court shall be refunded to the revision

petitioner/accused.

This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above.

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

css/