High Court Kerala High Court

P.Mohanan vs The Regional Agro Industrial … on 18 September, 2009

Kerala High Court
P.Mohanan vs The Regional Agro Industrial … on 18 September, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 7625 of 2009(W)


1. P.MOHANAN,S/O.KRISHNAN,PANNIYODAN HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE REGIONAL AGRO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,

3. K.V.VENU,UNSKILED ORKER (HG),AGRL.

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.V.BABY

                For Respondent  :SRI.M.SASINDRAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :18/09/2009

 O R D E R
                               S. Siri Jagan, J.
               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                       W. P (C) No. 7625 of 2009
               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                Dated this, the 18th September, 2009.

                              J U D G M E N T

The petitioner and the 3rd respondent are employed as skilled

workers on daily wages in the 1st respondent-Society with effect from

1993. The services of both of them were regularised on 20-5-1996.

As such, according to the petitioner, both of them stand similarly

situated in respect of service benefits. The petitioner’s grievance now

is that by Ext. P4, certain service benefits are sought to be conferred

on the 3rd respondent , which have been denied to the petitioner.

According to the petitioner, the same amounts to discrimination.

2. I am of opinion that this is a matter which the petitioner

should agitate in proceedings under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-

operative Societies Act. A Division Bench of this Court has, in

Malappuram Dt. Co-op. Bank Ltd. v. Malappuram Dt. Co-op.

Bank Employees W.F. Committee, 2001(2) KLT 44, held that a writ

petition is maintainable in respect of service matters of an employee

of the Society if the Society contravenes any provision of the Act or

Rules. The petitioner has no case that any provision of the Act or

Rules have been contravened in the matter. Therefore, I am of

opinion that it is only appropriate that the petitioner resorts to

proceedings under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies

Act in respect of the subject matter. This is all the more be so since

for deciding the issues involved, it would require evidence to be

adduced.

Accordingly, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to

seek remedies under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies

Act, this writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.

Tds/