P.N.Geetha vs The Director Of Urban Affairs on 12 January, 2010

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 982 of 2010(W)


1. P.N.GEETHA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS,
                       ...       Respondent

2. ATHE JOINT DIRECTOR(ADMINISTRATION)

3. K.K.BABU,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.V.BOSE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN

 Dated :12/01/2010

 O R D E R
                         K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J.
               ------------------------------------------------------------
                        W.P(C) NO: 982 OF 2010
                -----------------------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 12th January, 2010.

                                    JUDGMENT

The petitioner is working as a Health Inspector Gr.II in

Irinjalakuda Municipality. She has been working there since

11.11.2008, having been posted there as per Ext.P1. The petitioner

has been requesting for a posting to Ernakulam for the reason that

she is settled at Ernakulam with her husband and family. Earlier

the third respondent had submitted a request for transfer showing

a wrong date as his date of retirement. Acting on the said

misrepresentation he had been granted a transfer to the place that

he had sought for. Subsequently, the fraud was detected and he

has been placed under suspension. The complaint of the petitioner

is that though there is a vacancy available in the Cochin

Corporation, she has not been posted to the said vacancy. Exts.P3,

P6 and P12 are the representations submitted by the petitioner in

this regard. In view of the fact that Ext.P12 representation is

pending consideration of the first respondent, this writ petition can

be disposed of directing the said authority to consider and pass

orders thereon, on an early date.

2. In the result this writ petition is disposed of directing the

WPC 982/2010 2

first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner

evidenced herein by Ext.P12 as expeditiously as possible and at any

rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy

of this judgment.

3. The petitioner is permitted to produce a copy of this writ

petition as well as a copy of this judgment before the first

respondent for compliance.

                                         K. SURENDRA MOHAN
                                                 Judge
jj

WPC 982/2010    3

                      K.K.DENESAN & V. RAMKUMAR, JJ.

—————————————————-

M.F.A.NO:

—————————————————–

JUDGMENT

Dated: