Loading...

P Narayanaswamy @ Narayana vs State on 9 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
P Narayanaswamy @ Narayana vs State on 9 January, 2009
Author: N.Ananda
~...-uum war maruw-ummm z-man uwulxitg ,'uf" fu-\xNfll&nA fllfifl (£01.18? OF IQARNATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KfiLRNA.TAKA HfGI"§ €05.38?

3: TEE rmg mam? Q? gaafiawma AT Bg%3€E€§AI»QR§;:«.."~«j 7. _ ,

BREE-D 'fi+ES*I'I-E mm? GE" Jamgwzw  .   A'

BE %'$RE

T1-m HGFELB 1%.m.J:.I§':mE 

 

:;:RHm:AL ?E'E'fi'IfiH EC%.49§{§;§gt§V.  A

P$Hsrayam1swam§;@ Ramyarm _  1  * 
S! e.Pape. Gewfla @ '   -  " 
R{e.Ha.'9Q3§    
{Saga Mymre. 3' --:'  » "

A % L    v1.:.;§'I~4IfE';'*I"I'I'IQI*'¢'I£iI§
(By S:-i fiashsk  %i;;531i;«k;%:.§s¢~%%gjA%;.kyAj%%%  % 

A1583:

smug by uciayaggi  gmm  'A
1.

x2x3mn;«e,_ %%%%% mREB%”§flENT
{By 3fi’?.ifi§E§awa;;’§&§.i.–._$PP%

W §$’t.i’E1$£: is fiké ¥.z1’$.”§38 CIZRC
V prayfizg ‘E5! larfiazge tim pctitsiaacr ax: mii in tha meant sf
m”xw’£g_iI1 Grime Nalfififfiw? of Uéayayki 38.;
‘= *–I¥§!5}’m};fi lfifiiwtrict wiximh fa r®§at:az*a& far the afikzme
‘ unclar Eiasfl 4&5, 4?}, 420 fifi 323 and

__ T3_1f’$;13; 14, 32, 3% afiiafitaka Excise: fisct.

V This petiticgn an far aréers téés flay? the

V ‘ » ffiorurt mag éhaa Eaélawizg:

uuum £1? MKMREAM MEGW €0UR§’ KARNATAKA H1614 COURT OF KKRNATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C031?!’ Q? KARNATAKA HIGH 60%.???

Mi

GREEK

Tim Eaamaén Gamma} far V 3»

mwzzz fiat” diemiami mi” the as

2. Mam ifi aeaémwffid,

3. Pefifirsn V;=;£§:si:%;¥L3?§§d” bmomza

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information