High Court Kerala High Court

P.P.Mohammed Farook vs Union Territory Of Lakshdweep on 26 October, 2010

Kerala High Court
P.P.Mohammed Farook vs Union Territory Of Lakshdweep on 26 October, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 32242 of 2010(E)


1. P.P.MOHAMMED FAROOK, PALLIPPURA HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHDWEEP
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS & RURAL

3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.RAJENDRAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :26/10/2010

 O R D E R
                       S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
               - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                  W.P.(C)No.32242 of 2010
               - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
          Dated this the 26th day of October, 2010

                         J U D G M E N T

The respondents prepared a rank list for appointment

of provisional Drivers in the 4th respondent Panchayat. As

per Ext.P2, such provisional appointments have to be only

for 89 days and on completion of 89 days such engagements

should be discontinued and fresh hands should be engaged

from the same list, contends the petitioner. The petitioner’s

grievance now is that, despite the above legal position, the

provisional Drivers already appointed from the list is being

continued without offering chance to the other persons in

the list for being engaged as provisional Drivers. Detailing

this grievance, the petitioner has filed Ext.P5

representation before the 4th respondent. Petitioner seeks a

direction to the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders

on Ext.P5 as expeditiously as possible.

W.P.(C)No.32242 of 2010
2

2. I have heard the standing counsel appearing for

the respondents 1 to 3 also. In the nature of the order

I propose to pass I do not think it necessary to issue notice

to the 4th respondent at this juncture.

3. Having heard the counsel for the petitioner and

the standing counsel for respondents 1 to 3, I dispose of this

writ petition with a direction to the 4th respondent to

consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 as expeditiously as

possible, at any rate within a period of one month from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording

an opportunity of being heard to all concerned.

The petitioner shall forward a copy of the writ petition

along with a certified copy of this judgment to the

4th respondent for compliance.

S. SIRI JAGAN
JUDGE

shg/