P Prakash S/O Perumal vs Papaiah on 9 June, 2008

0
124
Karnataka High Court
P Prakash S/O Perumal vs Papaiah on 9 June, 2008
Author: Anand Byrareddy


uuau ur nnxmnlnlxn HIE.-i:-1 COOK?” O’F..KARNATAKA H£GH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KAIINIATAKA I-HGH COURT

36 ‘mg 3193 cmm 1}? xammaam AT ”
m;r~E§ ‘2’:-:53 mg saw 953′ 9? C I’

BEFOR2§

mg zmzrsnz mt. waasmfbzrsy O

gamma: ‘

3 vmwsic j’ C
mmamarz’21’¢ 1
x;n3’aa§;a’mg.–caz.OH¥;”1s*rtaz,iegx,:
§5 §%, mmmaifioan
E!s1i’G.fi!,Gitfi’}Dm’?i’I¥IGT._’ ._ A ~

; ‘ . -._ ”

I 3}’ 9′
4jlB§K£’hIGR ., _
” .V $”nfiEk§fi.§’T.I_EA H9313,
‘ ,
DISTHCT.

2 mt am

&gs:.cHa u 3
.. smasmnmsumxcn cc.

” V “xH0.9;:,I1I.scoRanAD
..BB.EG.£s1.£¥fl-560 042. .. R%Bnm’x’s

.1, 313120 mum FGK m:

xtowxcam R«-1 mmsm mm)

EEFA FILED 333 173(1) OF EV ACT AGAIHST THE
JiIDG3E%T.°sR’fi AWARI} DAIEE: 23.2.3006 PASSEII IE HVC
Hf). 4€F24fE3l34 GK THE FILE QF ‘HIE VIE ABEL. JIIDGR,
COURT :3? SEAL}; CASISES, HEi$E§, HPLCT-V,

Z3

OURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT AAOFIKARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

1%}

3FfiIEfihR fifififi, fiE§B’Gn°a3.£3RE. ES€3CH.I¥0.3′},
ALLG%’§G TEE {HARE PETEFIG1? F1333 CQMP’ENSi’L§KQ.H«.4fiZ§D
fifififiifi C$flfl’TQF CC1@’%SA’I’!0H.. 3

‘I”h:is ma, ::a2’nmg’ on for m: 1,3,,-,’1«,Og,:} %

2% Cmzrt, (MO the

Etimrfi the wattage} ,f¢r’:.. tn:

mama} far Z'rI£:.;'2;    I' '

2.3 The   in a goods

wmcés   of the which
 §f:3Im1a amt had undergono

  p-er?rJd. Tm medical

cvpined that an am-aum: of the

% % there was dhabiiity m the whale
awn: mi’ 18%, tha appeilant was before thus
V V’ fliaima Tribunal sneaking amzpenmtsiun.
I ‘§”§*§b1ms.I has awarded a tow; sum of Ra.66,00(}I-,

E

Glaimsing as» woflsrman Gfthe mum. In this

matter, the e t if any, mm:

mtitémd to the saw wt:-uid hs:ve..#;g

swna? am that 11% izmurefs

with ma gramisc in vsa:I,I[h%w§uIa my-,IG%

Hm-am of AM-.1ich’:ecu3d he

scape 5501:

mde: it therefara Tribunal was
z:] by fi”a<:ture to the neck of
fibtzigs.' disability to the whole
b0d§' x'5£=:*"T{Gh'.§ tm Tribunai was tntally

Eiey. who was not mm

fix-at irzatanae and the aasasaxmnt

: dfiabélity was apparently amfius
I faijd g Igazad. The Tribunal has rightly rejacted tha

yurpaaes ::sfc::I@utat:i::I:::: of any cJsJm' tcawards

_ :%:a::mp%mr§afian undaer the head fimzre has of earning
The 'Ii'%una.1 has awarded subsmn:tn1'

3 amouma mmw an varicus hmfia and that it does not

UUKI Ur mmmnm HIGH coma _oI=-..;<AnNArAxA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or !(ARNA'!'Ai(A HIGH COURT

%

wax-mm any mt by Ms court in that

a?su§::pur£§ng matmial to esnhaw the same.

5. 0% that: wntsanmm. in 153:: 3

m.1&,,amg~ mwards pm F

Eaww aflaa, in the op§11ion same
requires ‘L0 be sum of
RS.5,t’.§1%?flf-.. Irjg–s»§ are
wanxserrasazi; the appellant
warm baa of 335,000;-.

in an {ax §'”uf:L:i’z-e aanfirag ‘3

mmnea, nmted the. medical

in to the

¢:pge§1Fa;;:, _cant1at; be said that the appellant

.§z”;§erV_’ in the extant -.::If 13% to the

. poimed nut W the: Tribunal, 111 the face

that the fracture aufiered m the

$11.13 which is mat a wfiht beakrm beam. the

Em’vm” been assessed at 18% does mt immlc-3

O F’ mnfifimacae as to the am-wracy nsf the same’ Hnwevm, in

JURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OFKARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA I”liGI’l COURT OF KARNATAKA HiGI’l COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

7%

éhe abaem at’ 3135* matsrial by

paractzitiznner, even E 56% of the

F1»1-fwaw af ompumuzan cf mg: Aoga cf x

mpadqr, the app-eliant A.i:,a

summntia} aum. Henge, A

patmamage af disabflity as whola
may anfi if «on that n1u1t’:pher
mtimflg. if towanis
mm w§u1d be entitled
me a Tbrnl, ‘m my
mg be entitled to as

af fixture

:_f’ Er1. s::’:%. i5&’»:*-f.:a.:¢=:. zt11§ t::5x’zfiantiun of the mutual fiat flw

ac liability that mum arise under

4:.he’BV3%?:=§3&’k:rat駒_a’:;f3om.p:9matian Act, and theréare, the

mum is he be reatrkzted. ta tlrm mm-. is

‘ wiaéch the irmwzar wnuki have tn work out

_ f_ 33¢ ethm rmpommm since the Tribunal has
~§.¢e1.».~1 tlxattmyerejoimlymnd many liable to pay the

auuau OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURTAADEKARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURY OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

mama at’ mzgmafion, The said finding rexmdna

6

s
undmurfied gimme the imurcr is net. in
fii . tha 9&1
h ma %
ea Ra._.a1,s-ao;- with of tha

$500 $9: §<…<zxS_ …O Enou :9… 5.<.p<z._§ ".0 .5500 $0.: S_.<~<2.__5. Lo 5500 $3…. <:(_¢Zx<L…..5_.._xDDJ …..a=.. 5.<.<z:5. .5 :53"

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *