High Court Kerala High Court

P.R.Sadanandan vs State Of Kerala on 8 August, 2007

Kerala High Court
P.R.Sadanandan vs State Of Kerala on 8 August, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 35704 of 2005(A)


1. P.R.SADANANDAN, S/O.V.M.KUNHIRAMAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS,

3. ACCOUNTS OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :08/08/2007

 O R D E R
                       ANTONY DOMINIC,J.
                         -------------------------
                   W.P ( C) No.35704 of 2005
                        --------------------------
            Dated this the 8th day of August, 2007

                          J U D G M E N T

Petitioner has retired from the service of the Panchayat

Department on 31.5.2002. The prayer in this writ petition is to direct

the respondents to disburse the Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity and

arrears of pay arising out of pay revision. Pursuant to the interim

order passed on 21.2.2005, Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

arrears of DCRG have already been released. Now what remains is

the petitioner’s claim for arrears arising out of pay revision and

interest claimed thereon. I notice that highlighting his grievances,

petitioner has filed Ext.P4 representation before respondents 1 and 2

and the counsel submits that the representations are still pending.

After hearing both sides, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 1st

respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit-P4, as

expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date

of receipt of a copy of this judgment. I clarify that what survives to

be considered in Ext. P4 is only the claim regarding pay revision

arrears and claim for interest. Before final orders are passed,

petitioner shall be given notice and an opportunity to be heard, if he

so desires.

(ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE)
ma

K.THANKAPPAN,J

CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999

ORDER

25th May, 2007