High Court Kerala High Court

P.Rajamani Amma @ Radha vs K.S.Padmanabhan Nair on 26 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
P.Rajamani Amma @ Radha vs K.S.Padmanabhan Nair on 26 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Mat.Appeal.No. 791 of 2009()


1. P.RAJAMANI AMMA @ RADHA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. K.S.PADMANABHAN NAIR,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SIRAJ KAROLY

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.N.PURUSHOTHAMA KAIMAL

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice M.C.HARI RANI

 Dated :26/11/2009

 O R D E R

R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *
C.M.Appl.No.2912 of 2009 &
Mat.Appeal No.791 of 2009

———————————————-
Dated this the 26th day of November 2009

O R D E R & J U D G M E N T

Basant,J

This petition is to condone the delay of 817 days in filing a

Mat.Appeal. The appeal in turn is directed against an order

granting divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

That application was filed by the respondent herein.

2. The parties were before this court in another

Mat.Appeal No.273/07. That matter was referred to the Lok

Adalath. Parties settled their disputes before the Lok Adalath.

As a term of the said settlement, parties agreed to live together

after setting aside the order of divorce granted as per the

impugned order. It is accordingly that the parties belatedly have

come before this court to file this appeal. Respondent has

entered appearance. A learned counsel appears for him. The

learned counsel have placed before us the order passed by the

Lok Adalath dated 10/09/2009 in Mat.Appeal No.273/07. They

have also filed a joint statement dated 26/10/2009 duly signed by

the parties and countersigned by their counsel.

C.M.Appl.No.2912 of 2009 &
Mat.Appeal No.791 of 2009 2

3. We are, in these circumstances, satisfied that the

application for condonation of delay can be allowed. The appeal

can be admitted and allowed. The impugned order can be set

aside, as agreed.

4. In the result,

a) C.M.A.No.2912/07 is allowed. Delay of 817 days is

condoned.

b) Mat.Appeal No.791/09 is allowed as agreed by both

sides.

c) The impugned order granting divorce in

O.P.No.273/04 passed by the Family Court, Kottayam is set

aside.

d) O.P.No.273/04 shall stand dismissed.





                                           (R.BASANT, JUDGE)



                                     (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE)
jsr



                  // True Copy//    PA to Judge

C.M.Appl.No.2912 of 2009 &
Mat.Appeal No.791 of 2009     3

C.M.Appl.No.2912 of 2009 &
Mat.Appeal No.791 of 2009     4




                               R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ.




                                                .No. of 200




                                       ORDER/JUDGMENT




                                               29/07/2009