E
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE W DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2009
BEFORE 4 it A."
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARALI _
CRIMINAL it
BETWEEN: A 2 2
P S Nagendra Babu,
S / O.P. Sathyanarayanaiah,
Aged about 43 years, . :
R/a.Vijayalakshmi Nilaya', _ A
Behind Dharmachathra Readf' 'V
Chikkaballapura'TOw"nv-,"" -- " L
ChikkabalIapura:;.VpppZ" APPELLANT
[By Sri:v'Nafayar1_a 8: ,'.lASSVOciates)
V. Jagannatha VShett3Af".@V agannath,
_, _ S / O (' enkatachalavpatlfii,
. "'Maf1agii--1"g Partner, """ H
":2 S1ji'V_aiah'n and 'Enterprises,
A Nt)vL.79}' 2}' 11* O'rOSs,
l\/iagadi RO-ad,p'BangalOre. . . RESPONDENT
flv[By Raghavendra Rao, Adv.)
it Crl. Appeal is filed under Section 378(4) Cr.PC
A..”pJ;”a3,’i;rig to Set aside the impugned dated 12.12.2008 in CC
NO.405/2006 On the file Of the learned Principal Civil Judge
A ~{J–r. Dn.) 8: JMF C, Chikaballapura by allowing this appeal,
__»»-..i:””‘-e-\_._._..
consequently convict the accused/respondent for the offence
p/u/s.I38 of NI Act and punish him by passing proper
sentence and award compensation to the appellant as per
Sec. 1 1′? of NI Act in accordance with law.
This Crl. Appeal coming on for Admission the
Court delivered the following: * » — =
JUoGMs,:f”d
This appeal is by the J
on the file of the learned Dn’.)’&
JMF C, Chikkaballapur.lhererinafter”‘-referred-..to~’gas the ‘Trial
Court’ for short) againstlthed’ order of acquittal
dated Icase acquitting the
accused’ofthe_offence’*»tii3.der_wSectior1 188 of the Negotiable
Instrurnents referred to as the ‘NI Act’ for
short) .. _
2.6-Tl1ongh«.,:ti1i_s appeal is listed today for admission, it is
talsienfodr’ iiiialcI=.d’isposa1 by consent of the learned counsels for
‘.Vboth4d”the’ sides and their arguments on merits are heard.
–*
7
established by the complainant. I do not find any reasons to
take a View different from the {me taken by the T rial Court.
For the reasons aforesaid, the prese1f1t._’:”‘appeal is
dismissed as being devoid of merits.
t t}UDGEfig
Bkm.