P.Santhosh vs Member Secretary on 11 December, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA.No. 2371 of 2008()



1. P.SANTHOSH
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. MEMBER SECRETARY, K.S.Y.W.BOARD.
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

 Dated :11/12/2008

 O R D E R
                      H.L.Dattu,C.J. & A.K.Basheer,J.
                     --------------------------------------------
                              W.A.No.2371 of 2008
                      -------------------------------------------
                      Dated, this the 11th December, 2008

                                  JUDGMENT

H.L.Dattu,C.J.

Being aggrieved by the orders passed by the learned Single

Judge in W.P.(C).No.35098 of 2008, dated 27.11.2008, the petitioner in the

writ petition has presented this Writ Appeal.

(2) Petitioner is the Team Manager of a Drama Troop, which

has got second prize in the District Level competition. Aggrieved by the

action of the office bearers of the District Level competition, the petitioner

had to file an appeal before the appellate authority. The said appeal is also

rejected by Exhibit P1 order.

(3) Aggrieved by the rejection of the appeal, the petitioner was

before this Court in W.P.(C).No.35098 of 2008, inter alia, seeking a direction

to the respondents, to permit the petitioner’s Drama team to participate in the

Kerala State Youth Welfare Board State Level Keralotsavam-2008.

(4) The learned Single Judge has rejected the writ petition on

the ground, that, the Regulation governing the competition would provide,

that, the team which secures the first prize in the District Level competition

can participate in the State Level competition. The learned Judge has also

observed, that, the Regulations have no statutory force as such and,

accordingly, has declined to entertain the writ petition.

W.A.No.2371 of 2008 – 2 –

(5) We have also carefully perused Exhibit P1 order passed by

the appellate authority and also the orders passed by the learned Single Judge.

In our considered opinion, we do not see any error, whatsoever, either in the

order passed by the appellate authority or in the order passed by the learned

Single Judge, which would call for our interference in appeal. Therefore, the

Writ Appeal requires to be rejected and it is rejected.

Ordered accordingly.

H.L.Dattu
Chief Justice

A.K.Basheer
Judge
vku/-