High Court Kerala High Court

P. Sasankan vs State Of Kerala on 3 January, 2008

Kerala High Court
P. Sasankan vs State Of Kerala on 3 January, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 362 of 2008(R)


1. P. SASANKAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTOR OF TOURISM,

3. THE DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE

4. MANOHARAN P.,

5. M.V. KUNHIRAMAN,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :03/01/2008

 O R D E R
                                   V.GIRI,J.

                            -------------------------

                       W.P ( C) No. 362  of 2008

                            --------------------------

                   Dated this the 3rd January, 2008


                              J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is at present working as Manager Gr.II

pursuant to Exhibit P1 order dated 3.10.2007. Exhibit P12 is

the select list published by the Convener of the Departmental

Promotion committee for the post of Manager Gr.I. Aggrieved by

the fact that petitioner was not included in the select list,

petitioner submitted Exhibit P14 statutory representation

thereto and the same is pending before the 3rd respondent. The

petitioner also has a grievance as regards the date on which he

was promoted to the post of Manager Gr.II, according to him, he

ought to have been promoted earlier with effect from 23.7.2003.

This claim is contained in Exhibit P16 pending before the 1st

respondent.

After having heard the learned Government Pleader also,

this writ petition is disposed of in the following terms:

i) The 3rd respondent shall consider Exhibit P14 and if

the petitioner’s claim is found to be acceptable, necessary

remedial action shall be taken, within one month from the date

W.P ( C) No. 362 of 2008

2

of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If necessary, respondents 4

and 5 shall also be heard before such action is taken by the 3rd

respondent.

ii) The 1st respondent shall consider Exhibit P16 and take

a decision thereon, within two months from the date of receipt

of a copy of this judgment.

(V.GIRI, JUDGE)

ma

W.P ( C) No. 362 of 2008

2

K.THANKAPPAN,J

CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999

ORDER

25th May, 2007