P Shivappa S/O Puttaveraiah vs State Of Karnataka Rep By … on 24 July, 2009

,3 uanjam,

..   {By Sri.Kém §;araju for
 ";"!s:xi.;a:11v;:*_t3:1=ené Chamber, Ativ.)

'T of iéaraatalm, -

T? " Unanahhaiat :i Felice Station,

. 3 -
IN THE HIGH COURT {JF KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE}

EDATED THIS THE 2473 DAY OF JULY 2009
BEFORE

THE H()N'BLE MRJUSTICE SUBHASH B...riijI' 5;." J  _

 

BE'}"WEEN:

1 Pfihivappa,

S] 0 Putaveraiah,

Aged about 43 years,

R] at FWD Quarters,  '
Bangalore University  W ._
Gnanabarathi,  '

Bangaiore.
:2 Venkataiah; '  _ ' 

S/0 Madahisi,  ' '   ._ ;
Agcd,abo11t~f_iG   
SC/ST Asétzéiafion i3xet-sj::1e31t,--
Acatitmic 9=l'.'»(3"f.i';'€.Vi"i_-'~*.,,A 'E°io."3.,A ---- ' %
Gna1::abara&i., ' ' V'  

 _

 £'.gédi,a{bout 60 years;
'   Vice Pmsidcnt,
_  Aéademie V%'a';ion, No.8,
" ._  T
'_i3anga}Qre3,_  ...PETITI{}NERS

Rgpzesented by'

 



gg? '-

- 2 .
A330 mpmsented by its pubiic presecutor,
City Civil Court Complex,
Bangalom. .. RESPONDENT

(By Sri.I~Iom1ap;§a. HCGP)

This Criminai Petition is filed under Secti0n«...4_§'§£.':'(§3i; 1:i.s:';.

praying to set aside the order dated. 19.12.2008 pa-3scd"'i;3%L:"t11€.._I_II

Add}. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Bangalore i1:V'T'V.C.C;'Ii:5.

2515712087 and sama was confinned hyhthc FTC?-'v',--.Tii'-3Iiga§<)1°cvL.i:ti" . 

C3*1.R.P.No. 19/ 2009 dated.1'7.i2.2009 and by  a;.No.19/2009 dated 16.2.2009 on

{he file, Fast Tra£ii:--.{§f§uzjt:~V, Bangalore.

 '  ..}_:1ad. filad an appiicafion unclear Section 311 of
V Cr.§'§§r recalling the PWs--1 to 4 for c:mss~--
 cxa m1'11.z44=,'1"z::'..g;a;ii,V  Ivlagtistratc has obsczvcd that, F'Ws~i to 4

 ' '*.sijc:ce' examiized, they were 139$ c:ross--cxam:;a::ed by the defence

.1aw3};er"and as such, the cross--cxamiJ:1atien W38 taken as 'nil'.

~ E7x.r"c'1iTi.I1 the applicafion under Section 31 I of Cr.P.C.. nothirlg is

4°a "1:ft1en';:ioned except stating that the Wimessea am not cross-

 



 4: 'v'.TIv{I'\fI§i.IA% * 

examined. hence, they should be mcallcd for cro$s-examination.
N63 reasons are assignsd as to why 'Witfi6SSۤS are 'iewbf-;  
and dismissed the apP3izcatio11. The Itvisioxzsaj'   
cofisiderizlg all these aspects has fou11{£»t}:at,  u
given. to the defence to cmss--cxamine ':«PW;é§-1:  
application, no reasons are sta§¢§:i---.V.as     L'
recalled except stating that,    be (ions.
The application under    allowed only if
it is necessary. When no ref-;r.=:.:r1:--,~:~z   {here is mgr error,
which can be   or revisional

court.

Accofdingiy. ms:  and same is dismissed.

 sd/-3
 .....