P.T. Shamsudheen vs Tahsildar on 22 August, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 24380 of 2008(B)


1. P.T. SHAMSUDHEEN, PUTHURATHODI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. TAHSILDAR, MANNARKAD.
                       ...       Respondent

2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,

3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.MANSOOR.B.H.

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

 Dated :22/08/2008

 O R D E R
                                 K.M.JOSEPH, J.
                      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                          WP.(C) No.24380 of 2008
                      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                    Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2008

                                    JUDGMENT

Prayer in the writ petition is to pass orders on Ext.P3. By

Ext.P1 petitioner has been assessed to tax by the Tahsildar. Petitioner has

preferred revision as Ext.P3 before the second respondent, namely, the

Revenue Divisional Officer. According to the petitioner, the same is still

pending. He relies on Ext.P4 Circular and a decision of this court in W.P.

(C) No.36563 of 2007, which is produced as Ext.P5.

2. I heard learned Government Pleader also. He points out that

Ext.P3 is dated 25.10.2006 and even if it is treated as a revision, it is barred.

I do not know how the petitioner can seek a direction to consider Ext.P3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is rejected without prejudice to

the remedy available to the petitioner.

(K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE)

sb