High Court Kerala High Court

P.T.Thomas vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2008

Kerala High Court
P.T.Thomas vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 4567 of 2008()


1. P.T.THOMAS, PUNNAMMOOTTIL
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SUNITHA ANNIE CHERIAN,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTAYAM EAST

                For Petitioner  :SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :25/09/2008

 O R D E R
                                K. HEMA, J.
        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                        B.A. No. 4567 of 2008
        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
          Dated this the 25th day of September,2008

                                  O R D E R

Petition for anticipatory bail.

2. On a complaint lodged by defacto-complainant that

petitioners along with other accused ill-treated physically and

mentally defacto-complainant, a crime was registered against

them under section 498A IPC.

3. Petitioners are accused 2 and 4 who are father-in-law

and sister-in-law of defacto-complainant. Learned counsel for the

petitioners submitted that both 1st accused and defacto-

complainant had their second marriage. A child was born in the

wedlock and thereafter there was some strain in the marital

relationship. Petitioners who are father-in-law and sister-in-law

have nothing to do with the offence. They have not ill-treated

defacto-complainant. The matter was referred to the Lok Adalath

at High Court for settlement, but it could not be settled due to the

intervention of the defacto-complainant’s father, it is submitted.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that allegations are

made that defacto-complainant was harassed by all the accused.

But, only general allegations are made against petitioners and

hence petitioners may be directed to appear before the

Investigating Officer for interrogation and subject to that he has

BA 4567/08 -2-

no objection in granting anticipatory bail to petitioners.

5. Hence, the following order is passed:-

Petitioners shall surrender before the

Investigating Officer within seven days from

today and in case they are arrested, they shall

be released on bail on their executing a bond for

Rs. 25,000/- each with two solvent sureties each

for the like amount to the satisfaction of the

arresting officer on condition that they shall

make themselves available for interrogation by

the Investigating Officer as and when directed

and co-operate with the investigation.

This petition is allowed.

K.HEMA, JUDGE.

mn.