High Court Kerala High Court

P.V.Sajeev vs The Cochin Devaswom Board on 21 January, 2011

Kerala High Court
P.V.Sajeev vs The Cochin Devaswom Board on 21 January, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 34333 of 2010(N)


1. P.V.SAJEEV, JUNIOR DEVASWOM OFFICER,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. P.U.NANDAKUMAR,
3. E.S.DINESAN,
4. V.MURALEEDHARAN,JUNIOR DEVASWOM OFFICER,
5. M.SUDHEER,
6. K.R.SREEVALSAM,
7. M.R.SURESH, JUNIOR DEVASWOM OFFICER,

                        Vs



1. THE COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY,COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.O.D.SIVADAS

                For Respondent  :SRI.N.RAGHURAJ,SC,COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :21/01/2011

 O R D E R
                         S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
                  -----------------------------------
                    W.P.(C) No.34333 OF 2010
                ---------------------------------------
            Dated this the 21st day of January, 2011

                            JUDGMENT

The learned Standing Counsel for the Devaswom Board submits

that in respect of appointment of petitioners 1 to 5, there was

publication of advertisement inviting applications and an interview of

the applicants also was conducted. As far as petitioners 6 and 7 are

concerned, no records are available in respect of the same. But, still

the learned Standing Counsel would contend that it is to be

ascertained whether the petitioners’ claim for regularisation can be

allowed, in view of the Division Bench direction in that regard. He

would submit that the Board can consider Exts.P3 to P9

representations filed by the petitioners before the second respondent

in that regard in accordance with law.

In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with

a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on

Exts.P3 to P9 representations as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,

within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
acd