Padiyamma vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 9 February, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 476 of 2009()


1. PADIYAMMA, D/O.NANI, PALAMOOTTIL VEETTIL
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.MOHANLAL

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :09/02/2009

 O R D E R
                          K. HEMA, J.
         =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                     B.A. No. 476 of 2009
         =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
           Dated this the 9thday of February, 2009

                           O R D E R

Petition for bail.

2. The alleged offence is under section 55(g) of the Abkari

Act. According to prosecution, petitioner was found distilling

arrack and 90 litres of wash and utensils were seized from her

residence.

3. Petitioner was arrested on 1-1-2009. Learned Public

Prosecutor submitted that petitioner is involved in seven other

cases and hence, stringent conditions may be imposed while

granting bail but he has no objection in granting bail.

4. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that bail can be

granted to petitioner on conditions.

5. Hence, petitioner shall be released on bail on her

executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties each

for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate,

on the following conditions:-

1) Petitioner shall report before the

Investigating Officer on every alternate

day between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. until

further orders.

2) Petitioner shall not commit any offence

BA 476/2009 -2-

while on bail and in case breach of this

condition, bail is liable to be cancelled.

This petition is allowed.

K.HEMA, JUDGE.

mn.