Padmakant vs Amarnath on 3 March, 2011

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/7389/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 7389 of 2010
 

In


 

FIRST
APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 5048 of 2009
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

PADMAKANT
RASIKLAL SHAH DECD. THRO'KAILASHBEN PADMAKANT SHAH & 3 -
Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

AMARNATH
RAJDEVRAI BRAHMIN DELETE AS PER ORD.DT.30/08/10 & 5 -
Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
VIRAL SHAH FOR MR SATYAM Y CHHAYA
for
Petitioner(s) : 1 - 2. 
DELETED for Respondent(s) : 1, 
RULE
SERVED for Respondent(s) : 2 - 3. 
RULE SERVED BY DS for
Respondent(s) : 3, 
MR LALJI R MOKARIA for Respondent(s) : 4 -
5. 
DS AFF.NOT FILED (R) for Respondent(s) :
6, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 10/12/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE)

This
is an application for condonation of delay of 85 days caused in
filing the First Appeal.

Heard
Mr.Viral Shah on behalf of Mr.Chhaya for the applicants and
Mr.Kokaria for opponent Nos.4 and 5. The opponent Nos.2 and 3 are
served, but have chosen not to contest.

Considering
the contents of the application, it cannot be said that the delay
caused in filing the appeal has remained totally unexplained.
Therefore, we are of the view that the delay caused in filing the
appeal deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the application is
allowed. Delay is condoned. Rule is made absolute.

(A.L.Dave,J)

(V.M.Sahai,J)

pathan

Top