Pala Ram vs State on 9 July, 2008

0
34
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Pala Ram vs State on 9 July, 2008
                                                                           1

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
  --------------------------------------------------------


                       CRL APP BAIL No. 1195 of 2007
                                   IN
                         CRL APPEAL No.803 of 2007

                                     PALA RAM
                                       V/S
                                      STATE

    Mr. MRIDUL JAIN, for the appellant / petitioner

    Mr. JPS CHOUDHARY, PP

    Date of Order : 9.7.2008

                         HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J.
              HON'BLE SHRI KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI,J.

                                     ORDER

—–

Heard learned counsel for the appellant Pala Ram,

and the Public Prosecutor.

We have gone through the statements of the two

eye-witnesses, P.W.3, P.W.5, I.O. P.W.13, the informant

P.W.1 Mohan Lal, the father of the deceased, and had also

gone through the post mortem report, which doesn’t show any

sharp weapon injury to be on the person of the deceased,

while the case of the eye-witnesses is that the appellant

was having Kandala, a sharp edged weapon. Then according to

the prosecution (Ex.P.25), the weapon was recovered on the

information of, and at the instance of the accused, while

according to P.W.1, the weapon was lying broken on the

site, and was recovered by the police there-from. That

apart, we have also considered Ex.D.5, D.6 in conjunction
2

with the totality of circumstances, and the fact that the

appellant was on bail during trial, in our view, in the

totality of circumstances, we deem it proper to suspend the

sentence awarded to the appellant.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of

sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C is allowed, and it

is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Addl.

Sessions Judge, Srikaranpur, District Sri Ganganagar in

Sessions Case No.14/2004 vide his judgment dated 17.9.2007

against the accused-applicant Pala Ram S/o Bhoora Ram shall

remain suspended till the final disposal of the aforesaid

criminal appeal provided he furnishes a personal bond in

the sum of Rs.20,000/-, and two sound and solvent sureties

of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned

trial court for his appearance before this Court on the

conditions indicated below: –

(i) That he will appear before this Court on
8.8.2008.

(ii) That he will appear before the trial court
in the months of January and June of every year
till the appeal is decided.

(iii)That if the applicant changes the place of
residence, he will give in writing his changed
address to the trial court as well as to his
counsel in the High Court.

(iv)Similarly, if the sureties change their
address(s), they will give in writing their
changed address to the trail court.

The learned trial court shall keep the record of
3

attendance of the accused-applicant in a separate file.

Such file be registered as Cr. Misc. Case related to

Sessions Case in which the accused-applicant was tried and

convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in

that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating

to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused applicant does not appear before the

trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the

matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

( KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J.

/tarun/

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here