High Court Kerala High Court

Panavilakkodu Devasthanam Trust … vs The District Collector on 12 August, 2010

Kerala High Court
Panavilakkodu Devasthanam Trust … vs The District Collector on 12 August, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 25298 of 2010(J)


1. PANAVILAKKODU DEVASTHANAM TRUST REG.NO
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LA),

3. M/S.IDEB REAL ESTATE(P)LTD,9TH FLOOR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.P.SHINOD

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :12/08/2010

 O R D E R
                      T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
                     = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                          W.P.(C) No. 25298 OF 2010
                      = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

         DATED THIS, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2010.

                              J U D G M E N T

Petitioner herein represents the Panavilakkodu Devasthanam Trust.

Their grievance is regarding the non consideration of their claim for

compensation for the property said to be acquired under the Land

Acquisition Act. The property is sought to be acquired for the Vizhinjam

Harbour Project. According to the petitioner, property in Survey No. 283/1

and 287 part belongs to the Trust. But the proceedings are initiated

considering the third respondent as the owner of the property. The

complaint in the writ petition is that the petitioner’s rights for receiving

compensation is thus overlooked by the third respondent. It is also pointed

out that a civil suit as O.S. 226/2008 is pending between the petitioner and

the third respondent. Pointing out all these aspects, petitioner has filed

Ext.P4 representation before the first respondent District Collector .

Petitioner prays for a direction to the District Collector to consider the same

before finalizing the land acquisition proceedings.

2. Heard. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the first

WP(C) 25298/2010 2

respondent District Collector to consider and dispose of the representation

Ext.P4 with notice to the petitioner and the third respondent expeditiously.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
JUDGE.

KNC/-