Pandurang Chennappanavar vs Smt Jagadevi on 31 July, 2009

 

' "jag? m%RWa§'£@ mm»: cow

__ __-... .. nnIuv.HIM5.fl mm! comm' OF MRNMAM aaawfiwm

'~B§i33:

 

1:: mm HIGH ooua-r or xnnuamvca A'?  
33359 was THE 31* am: on'   
ma mavens nn.au§r;é§%%'s.x;:§ri z.«. ''
R. P . R0. avlzoos' '   R; P.N<§  
ammm:  "   E

1.

Pandurang cnah:uIpp;iaau§a;:;’ %
3/0 Tukaram Chennappanavag,”-j }
Agad about 75 ywaxfig ‘ ‘ ‘W

W70 Paadrang°Ghannappafiavar,

fiwd¢W$”¥flwp%

3. smt.T’r:uz§3.;nai:;,”%’ %
wzo,hata’§rgm 32§u;’
Agad4abau§”3?_ye§a;

All §rs’R[gt: xnr§bkha1agi Village,
gfihglki Taluk, Eiaar District.
“%.Z_ V_ ‘=- ….. Mn _Betitionars

” :1 ;iBQ$§i¢;§anivnnnan, Advccata’ALéQ3wWf;)

aw’

an§t.aa§aa’&vi, Wu Ammth Jabbado,

=_ Ageé afloat 33 yuars,

‘p,~a£at:”Nn.5?, vallalingn Rivas,

-5 vkramavu ? 5 T colony,
fiahanswaéi, Eangalaxa-560 043.

m.Roupon¢nt

iii’

This review petition is filed under order 47
Rule 1 at cyc praying ta raviww the ordor datad
14.2.2008 passed in CRP.ߢ.91?/2004.

This xeviev’ petition coming an :0: order:
this day, the Court made thy following:

$’.«W&”wHLB3 ‘Wn»’P’&..§tW…¢i§\oe\’:(_.;:m. mwu-W mn-