Gujarat High Court High Court

Pandya vs State on 4 August, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Pandya vs State on 4 August, 2010
Author: Mr.S.J.Mukhopadhaya,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice K.M.Thaker,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/721/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 721 of
2010 
 
=================================================
 

PANDYA
JIGNESHKUMAR SRIKRISHNABHAI - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT, THROUGH SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT (VILLAGE & 3 -
Respondent(s)
 

================================================= 
Appearance
: 
MR
EE SAIYED for Petitioner(s) : 1,MR SIKANDER SAIYED for Petitioner(s)
: 1, 
MR PK JANI AGP for Respondent(s) : 1 - 2. 
NOTICE SERVED
for Respondent(s) : 3 - 4. 
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for Respondent(s) :
3 - 4. 
MR MANISH J PATEL for Respondent(s) : 3, 
MR RJ GOSWAMI
for Respondent(s) : 4, 
MRJVVAGHELA for Respondent(s) :
4, 
=================================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER
		
	

 

Date
: 04/08/2010 

 

ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA)

From
the reply-affidavit filed on behalf the Collector, it appears that
the illegal encroachment in City Survey No.906, which falls within
the jurisdiction and competency of City Survey Superintendent, has
been removed. However, from the affidavit-in-reply on behalf of the
Panchayat, it appears that the illegal encroachment has not been
removed on the ground that higher authority has not given permission.
In the facts and circumstances, we direct the 4th
respondent Sarpanch Meghraj Gram Panchayat to remove the
illegal encroachment. The District Collector, Sabarkantha and the
concerned Superintendent of Police are directed to give police
protection and to ensure removal of illegal encroachment within six
weeks. Report the matter by the next date. In view of this Court’s
order, no permission is required to be taken from higher authorities,
though they are required to give notice to the concerned person
before removal of illegal encroachment. Post the matter on
20.09.2010 for orders in the 1st Board.

(S.J.

MUKHOPADHAYA, C.J.)

(K.M.

THAKER, J.)

[sn
devu] pps

   

Top