Pankaj Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 19 May, 2011

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                           Cr.Misc. No.15286 of 2011
                              PANKAJ KUMAR
                                     Versus
                            THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                     -----------

02 19.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the

petitioner and leaned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his

arrest in a case registered under Sections 272,

273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A)

of the Excise Act.

It is alleged that from the bettle shop

of the petitioner huge quantity of country made

liquors were seized.

It is submitted on behalf of the

learned counsel for the petitioner that in

fact, nothing was seized from the petitioner

and all seizures were made from the shop of

Awadhesh Kumar but the petitioner has

subsequently been implicated as the seizure

list does not bear the signature of any person

from the petitioner’s house or the shop of the

petitioner.

Let the learned court below pass

appropriate order while considering the regular

bail application of the petitioner if the

petitioner surrenders and prays for regular

bail within a period of four weeks from today.
2

With this observation, this

application is disposed off.

Let the order be faxed to the learned

C.J.M. Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with

Mahua P.S. Case No. 103 of 2011 at the cost of

the petitioner.

U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)