IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.33180 of 2010
PANKAJ KUMAR, SON OF RAJ KUMAR MAHTO
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
2. 04.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
counsel for the Informant and the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the
offence under Sections of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering that it is not a case under Section 304B
of the Indian Penal Code which would raise presumption
against the petitioner and there is no direct allegation against
him, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed
by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Samastipur, in Khanpur, P.S. Case No. 147 of 2009
subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will
be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit
giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The
bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about
any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall
also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if
the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature
after his release in the present case and thereafter the court
below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation
of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be
2
well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two
consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali